Unfotunatly, I've seen women saying that or something which could be interpreted like that.
I'm a little skeptical on the "could be interpreted" front. It's very easy to feel excluded, yes, especially when people aren't talking to you.
Well, for me it's kind of exclusionary. Why wrote stories only for a women audience?
Well, mostly because it's the audience that's here. Some people write what they want and don't care what other people read it. Some people write the stories they think the audience (which is predominately female, and shares certain experiences) wants to read. Other people find it important to be writing for women as a community that doesn't get written for very often, since almost all of the media that is produced (throughout history and throughout the world) is geared to males. Some people--like myself--find they can say things from a position within a community of women that would damaging or disempowering in a different context. The reasons for writing to an audience of women are probably as many as there are fen.
So, if I get you right, women wrote fanfiction and come to fandom because it's a cultural niche for women?
Well, I'm not sure what direction the causality flows--in large part it's become a cultural niche for women because women wrote fanfiction and came to fandom, and most likely the causality flows both ways--but the fact is that it is a cultural niche for women that should be perserved.
They don't come here because, well, I don't know, they have enjoyed a fictionnal universe and are wanting to explore it more?
Whoever does anything for only one reason?
And I don't think that fandom was built by women, it was built by individual.
No, sorry. Women on Earth in the 20th century didn't get to be individuals--the social context is too oppressive, they're always being interpellated in certain ways as part of a pattern of sexism in a sexist society. Calling them "individuals" isn't a way of disregarding the gender issues at work here.
You see, I tend to treat the men who act like assholes in the exact same way that women who act like assholes.
You and I have the privilege to be able to do that because we're male, and if we want we can just ignore the entire history of assholish behavior of men against women across the millenia. Whereas women can never forget the fact that they're female, and the social context that goes with that.
Yes, but fandom is not limited to that and should not be limited to that.
But that aspect of fandom should be preserved and I don't see what the issue with those who utilize and value it fighting against its co-optation.
But I tend myself to think that capitalism is the real issue here, fanlib didn't seemed motivated by a patriarchal logic for me but by a logic of profits. That's why I don't get it when people are picturing that like a fight between patriarchy and women.
The issues intersect; "patriarchal logic" and the "logic of profits" are very much tied in to each other. Fen have been discussing the way the gender and capitalism issues intersect long before the FabLib discussion began (other people in this thread have been showing you links to those discussions, and you can find more just by browsing at metafandom); it's not just a random attack on a Board of Directors who just happen to be male, but an acknowledgement of a pattern within which this is only an example.
" find it funny how guys always get their rage on when they figure out that most fanfiction just isn't for them. Most fanfic is written by women for women. But mention this and watch them howl. They just have to have their hands in everything don't they, otherwise us women are taking something away from them. Which is funny since fanfiction, particularly my branch of it, is one of the few places women can go to find their interests focused on. Guys have everything else, have a lot of places to see their perspective focused on, but us women we try to have a place that is just about us and when we get angry that a bunch of men are trying to make a buck off of that...well we're all just crazy bitches.
NO ONE said you didn't have a right to post your fanfiction. But you have to make everything about you. You're not being oppressed. *Points toward the media, the news, corporations, pretty much everything that caters to the male pov* Get over yourself."
I'm sad to suck at html and don't be able to underline the points which bother me, but I think you could understood how this kind of comments could be badly interpretated without beeing oversensitive and paranoid about evil women's oprimating poor little men.
And no, it was not evil male chauvinist who get this answer, it was people(male and women) who did't understood why the gender issue was so important and were more interessed by the copyright or the author's exploitation issue.If you want to check the context before to judge, look at the link that I've given in one of my previous post.
And you didn't trully answer to my question. They're writing for an audience mostly made of female? Yes, and what are they writing which could be specifically interessing for their readers as female? How the fact that their audience is female is supposed to influence their writings and the kind of subject they chose?
Personnaly, I don't write for men, don't write for female either, and don't write something grey which could be enjoyed by both hypothetical male and hypothetical female. So I don't understood why some writers were trying to limitate their audience to a gender, and I thinks it's kind of stupid to reduce your readers as their gender but well, maybe it's me...
But I could understood why you didn't made a clear answer. After all, when I was defending yaoi in front of a female sceptical friend, I said to her there is as much reasons to write yaoi there is people interessed by yaoi.
"Well, I'm not sure what direction the causality flows--in large part it's become a cultural niche for women because women wrote fanfiction and came to fandom, and most likely the causality flows both ways--but the fact is that it is a cultural niche for women that should be perserved."
For obvious reason, I didn't came to fandom because it's a cultural niche for women, I came to it because I've enjoyed a fictionnal universe to the point of adding some wagons to this locomotive. Most of the girls I know in fandom came inside for the same reasons, that's why I didn't get this concept of fandom as a feminine cultural niche.
Sure, if female feels more free to be themselves in fandom, it would be another reasons for them to enjoy it, but I don't think it could be the reason which bring them here and made them remaining here. Otherwise, they wouldn't have much fun in fandom in my opinion.^^;
(My second post and my God, why the firstt one looks like a compact block of a text which must be a pain to read?-_-; Sorry for that and my lack of skills in html...^^; )
"Calling them "individuals" isn't a way of disregarding the gender issues at work here." And I found personnaly depreciative and limitative to reduce an individual to his/her gender. And I don't think that women have beguined to write fanfiction because they're women, are enjoying it because they're women and have built fandom in the purpose of create a free space for female. So why are you considering those who have built fandom like women instead of fans, or writers? Those people are nothing outside of their gender? Their behaviour is strictly controled by their gender?
"Whereas women can never forget the fact that they're female, and the social context that goes with that." So women could never picture themselves as anything else that a woman? They're trapped in the patriarchy to the point they always act in reaction to an opressive pattern, they could never act and think by themselves outside of the place which are allowed to them by the patriarchy?
"But that aspect of fandom should be preserved and I don't see what the issue with those who utilize and value it fighting against its co-optation." I never said that this side of fandom shouldn't be preserved, but you were talking only about this side in your previous post.
Well, capitalism is a very complex issue and there is people more competent that me about this matter, but if you want my opinion, I think that capitalism could deal with gender equality without problem and could survive in a world free of the patriarchy.
(sigh) I hope that I didn't sound offensive or narrow-minded, and in the worse case, well, we could agree to desagree.^__^;
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
quicksilvereyes.livejournal.com) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
life_wo_fanlib2007-05-25 08:15 pm
Re: stupidity vs. sexism
I'm a little skeptical on the "could be interpreted" front. It's very easy to feel excluded, yes, especially when people aren't talking to you.
Well, for me it's kind of exclusionary. Why wrote stories only for a women audience?
Well, mostly because it's the audience that's here. Some people write what they want and don't care what other people read it. Some people write the stories they think the audience (which is predominately female, and shares certain experiences) wants to read. Other people find it important to be writing for women as a community that doesn't get written for very often, since almost all of the media that is produced (throughout history and throughout the world) is geared to males. Some people--like myself--find they can say things from a position within a community of women that would damaging or disempowering in a different context. The reasons for writing to an audience of women are probably as many as there are fen.
So, if I get you right, women wrote fanfiction and come to fandom because it's a cultural niche for women?
Well, I'm not sure what direction the causality flows--in large part it's become a cultural niche for women because women wrote fanfiction and came to fandom, and most likely the causality flows both ways--but the fact is that it is a cultural niche for women that should be perserved.
They don't come here because, well, I don't know, they have enjoyed a fictionnal universe and are wanting to explore it more?
Whoever does anything for only one reason?
And I don't think that fandom was built by women, it was built by individual.
No, sorry. Women on Earth in the 20th century didn't get to be individuals--the social context is too oppressive, they're always being interpellated in certain ways as part of a pattern of sexism in a sexist society. Calling them "individuals" isn't a way of disregarding the gender issues at work here.
You see, I tend to treat the men who act like assholes in the exact same way that women who act like assholes.
You and I have the privilege to be able to do that because we're male, and if we want we can just ignore the entire history of assholish behavior of men against women across the millenia. Whereas women can never forget the fact that they're female, and the social context that goes with that.
Yes, but fandom is not limited to that and should not be limited to that.
But that aspect of fandom should be preserved and I don't see what the issue with those who utilize and value it fighting against its co-optation.
But I tend myself to think that capitalism is the real issue here, fanlib didn't seemed motivated by a patriarchal logic for me but by a logic of profits.
That's why I don't get it when people are picturing that like a fight between patriarchy and women.
The issues intersect; "patriarchal logic" and the "logic of profits" are very much tied in to each other. Fen have been discussing the way the gender and capitalism issues intersect long before the FabLib discussion began (other people in this thread have been showing you links to those discussions, and you can find more just by browsing at
Re: stupidity vs. sexism
Re: stupidity vs. sexism
"Calling them "individuals" isn't a way of disregarding the gender issues at work here."
And I found personnaly depreciative and limitative to reduce an individual to his/her gender.
And I don't think that women have beguined to write fanfiction because they're women, are enjoying it because they're women and have built fandom in the purpose of create a free space for female.
So why are you considering those who have built fandom like women instead of fans, or writers?
Those people are nothing outside of their gender? Their behaviour is strictly controled by their gender?
"Whereas women can never forget the fact that they're female, and the social context that goes with that."
So women could never picture themselves as anything else that a woman? They're trapped in the patriarchy to the point they always act in reaction to an opressive pattern, they could never act and think by themselves outside of the place which are allowed to them by the patriarchy?
"But that aspect of fandom should be preserved and I don't see what the issue with those who utilize and value it fighting against its co-optation."
I never said that this side of fandom shouldn't be preserved, but you were talking only about this side in your previous post.
Well, capitalism is a very complex issue and there is people more competent that me about this matter, but if you want my opinion, I think that capitalism could deal with gender equality without problem and could survive in a world free of the patriarchy.
(sigh)
I hope that I didn't sound offensive or narrow-minded, and in the worse case, well, we could agree to desagree.^__^;
Re: stupidity vs. sexism
Re: stupidity vs. sexism